The best project management tool for an open source maintainer is usually the one that does not move the work out of GitHub. Contributors already file issues and open pull requests there, so GitHub Projects is the default, and it is free. A second tracker such as Linear, Jira or Plane earns its place only when planning has to include people who never open the repository. This page compares six options on the limits and prices that matter to a volunteer-run project, all checked on 24 October 2026.
We make Gitsu, a client for GitHub Projects, so we have a side. Gitsu is one of the six, it is not ranked first, and the last section says where it does not fit.
What does an open source maintainer need from a tracker?
A maintainer needs four things: contributors who can see the work without a new account, a backlog that stays usable at hundreds of issues, triage that costs minutes rather than hours, and a bill that does not fall on volunteers. Maintainers describe the second and third in public. One maintainer reports missing same-day responses despite email, calendar and Slack notifications, and another says three volunteers cannot keep up with an issue backlog that duplicates inflate (both recorded in our pain-point research, with Reddit sources).
Those needs rule out some defaults. A free plan capped at 250 issues is a short runway for a project that has been public for years. A per-seat price is awkward when contributors come and go. A tool that cannot show contributors the roadmap makes the project harder to join.
How do the six tools compare?
The table holds the limits and prices from each vendor's own pricing page, checked on 24 October 2026. "Native" means the issues live in GitHub rather than being copied elsewhere.
| Tool | Native to GitHub | Free plan | First paid price | Fits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub Projects | Yes | Free on GitHub Free; public projects visible to everyone | Included on Free; Team is listed at $4 per user per month | Most projects |
| Linear | No | Unlimited members, 2 teams, 250 issues | Basic, $10 per user per month, yearly billing | Small core team, younger backlog |
| Zenhub | Yes, on top of GitHub | 1 workspace, 50 users, 2 repositories, 250 issues | Teams, $4.99 per user per month, billed yearly | Teams that want sprint reports |
| Jira | No | Up to 10 users, 2 GB storage | Standard, $8.48 per user per month on monthly billing | Foundations with non-engineering staff |
| Plane | No | Free plan; 12 users shown on the pricing page | Pro from $6 per seat | Projects that must self-host |
| Gitsu | Yes, a client | Free web app | Paid Seat for the macOS app and MCP; amount on the pricing page | Heavy triage on a GitHub project |
Is GitHub Projects enough on its own?
Yes for most projects, and it is the only option here that costs nothing and needs no second login. GitHub's documentation says everyone on the internet can view a public project, and only people with access to a private repository can see project items from it. GitHub's pricing page lists unlimited public and private repositories on the Free plan. A contributor can follow the board without an account in anything other than GitHub.
What it does less well is daily volume. Its table and board views work, but a maintainer working through a long queue wants saved filters and fewer clicks per decision. That gap is where a client such as Gitsu, or a lot of patience, comes in.
What does Linear offer an open source project?
Linear is a fast, separate tracker with cycles, triage and initiatives. Its Free plan allows unlimited members, 2 teams and 250 issues, and Basic at $10 per user per month on yearly billing lifts the issue cap and raises the team limit to 5. Linear's pricing page lists no open source programme.
Linear wins on polish and on planning features GitHub Projects lacks. Its cost to a maintainer is the second system: contributors keep filing on GitHub, so someone syncs or copies issues, and a project older than a few years may already exceed 250 issues. Our Linear comparison covers the sync trade-offs.
What does Zenhub offer an open source project?
Zenhub keeps the issues in GitHub and adds planning on top: automated sprint planning, estimates, epics, roadmaps and velocity reports are listed on every plan, including Free. Free allows 1 workspace, up to 50 users, 2 connected repositories and 250 issues. Teams costs $4.99 per user per month billed yearly and allows 50 repositories and 5,000 issues.
It suits a project run in sprints with a paid or semi-paid team. The catch for open source is visibility: Zenhub's pricing table lists "Non-GitHub users can view GitHub Issues" only on Enterprise, and its Free plan covers two repositories, which is tight for a project split across many. See the Zenhub comparison.
What does Jira offer an open source project?
Jira makes sense for a foundation or company-backed project where product, support and operations plan alongside engineers. Atlassian's Free plan covers up to 10 users with 2 GB of storage, and Standard is $8.48 per user per month on monthly billing. Work lives in Jira, linked to code by the GitHub for Atlassian app, so a volunteer project takes on a second system and its admin. For a typical volunteer maintainer team that is more process than the work needs. The Jira comparison goes through the integration.
What does Plane offer an open source project?
Plane is an open-source tracker with cloud and self-hosted deployments. Its pricing page shows a Free plan, with 12 users listed beside it, and Pro from $6 per seat. It fits a project that must own its tracker or run it on its own server, though the server is an operating cost someone volunteers to carry. Plane's work lives in Plane, not in GitHub, and we did not test its GitHub integration, so we make no claim about it.
Where does Gitsu fit for a maintainer, and where does it not?
Gitsu fits a maintainer who already runs a GitHub project and spends the week triaging it. It is a client over the same issues, so contributors see no change. Its quick filters select open items assigned to you, authored by you or mentioning you, and a Relationships filter finds issues that have a linked pull request. Nested AND/OR filters, bulk edits and a fixed keyboard map cover the rest of a triage pass. The web app is free; the macOS app and MCP access for coding agents need a paid Seat.
It does not fit every maintainer:
- Large backlogs. Gitsu loads up to 2,000 items per project and tells you when it stopped.
- Several projects at once. It shows one project at a time; multi-project workspaces and cross-project views are product non-goals.
- Notifications and review. It has no notifications inbox and no pull request review.
- Sprint reporting. It has no automatic sprint rollover, velocity or burndown.
- Volunteer budgets. The macOS app needs a paid Seat; only the web app is free.
The practical test is cheap. Open one project in the free web app, apply the filter you use for triage and make a bulk edit. If it saves you time, add a Seat. If not, nothing about your project has changed. For a maintainer's response queue, read the triage guide; for the wider field, the roundup of GitHub Projects tools.

How we checked
Free-plan limits and prices for six tools read from their own pricing pages on 24 October 2026, set against Gitsu's own non-goals and 2,000-item cap from its PRD and client code, and the maintainer complaints recorded in its pain-point research.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best project management tool for an open source project?
For most projects, GitHub Projects, because contributors already file issues and pull requests on GitHub and a public project is visible to everyone on the internet. Choose a separate tracker such as Linear, Jira or Plane only when planning must include people who never touch the repository.
Is Linear free for open source maintainers?
Linear has a Free plan with unlimited members, 2 teams and 250 issues. It does not advertise an open source discount on its pricing page. A project with more than 250 issues needs Basic at $10 per user per month on yearly billing, as of 24 October 2026.
Do contributors need an account in the tracker?
Not with GitHub Projects, since contributors already have GitHub accounts and can view a public project. With a separate tracker, contributors keep filing on GitHub and a maintainer has to sync or copy them. Zenhub lists viewing GitHub issues without a GitHub account as an Enterprise feature.
Is Gitsu free for maintainers?
The Gitsu web app is free. The macOS app and MCP access for coding agents need a paid Seat, with the current price on the Gitsu pricing page.
Can Gitsu replace a notifications inbox?
No. Gitsu works on the items in one GitHub project at a time, has no notifications inbox and no pull request review, and loads up to 2,000 items per project. Use GitHub notifications to find conversations and a project view to track decisions.
Try it on your own boardsGitsu opens your GitHub Projects boards in the browser. Sign in with GitHub and work on the same issues your team already uses.
Open the web app